Legal Opinion

State v. Blake

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2010No. CC 041136416; CA A131739; SC S057117PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

The issue in this criminal case is whether the trial court should have merged defendant’s guilty verdicts for one count of forgery in the first degree, ORS 165.013(l)(a), and one count of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree, ORS 165.022(1), when both counts were based on the single act of attempting to make a purchase with a forged $100 bill. The trial court entered a judgment of conviction on two counts, and the Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. State v. Blake, 225 Or App 501, 201 P3d 941 (2009). We allowed review and now reverse and remand to the circuit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. ConnallyOregon Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. GensitskiyOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. KimbroughOregon Supreme Court · 2018

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API