Legal Opinion
Giese v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 27, 1976No. 76-AB-88, CA 5928PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*931THORNTON, J.
The sole issue presented here is whether claimant’s unlawful activities dining off-duty hours constituted "misconduct connected with his work,” disqualifying him from receiving unemployment compensation. ORS 657.176.
Petitioners Portland State University and the Employment Division seek judicial review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board holding that the university’s discharge of claimant was not for misconduct connected with his work.
There is no dispute as to the facts. Claimant was employed by the university as a professor of French from September 1965 until his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'NEAL v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Gregory v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Geraths v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. OstranderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Babcock v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- MacEy v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Employment Security Commission v. Western Gas Processors, Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Nelson v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Feagin v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Bunnell v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.