Gregory v. Anderson

The issue before us on this appeal is whether the employee Anderson was discharged “for misconduct connected with his employment” within the meaning of sec. 108.04 (5), Stats., so as to bar him from unemployment compensation benefits for the period of his unemployment following his discharge.

This court in Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck (1941), 237 Wis. 249, 259, 296 N. W. 636, declared:

“. . . the term'misconduct’as used in sec. 108.04 (4) (a) [now sec. 108.04 (5)], Stats., is limited to conduct evincing *136such wilful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interests as is found in deliberate…