Legal Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. Ostrander

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1975No. Appeal, 1422 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

It is the declared policy of this Commonwealth under Section 3 of the Unemployment Compensation Law 1 (Act), 43 P. S. §752, to provide economic security to persons “during periods when they become unemployed through no fault of their own.” Our Supreme Court has said: “That section is not merely a perfunctory preface but is, rather, the keystone upon which the entire Act rests and the basis upon which individual sections of the Act must be interpreted and construed.” Lybarger Unemployment Compensation Case, 418 Pa. 471, 476, 211 A.2d 463, 466 (1965). The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Department L. I. v. Unemplmnt. Comp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. BudzanoskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. DerkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Giese v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Huff v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Strokes v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API