Babcock v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Claimant appeals a denial of his claim for unemployment benefits made by the Employment Appeals Board, one member dissenting. ORS 657.176(2) provides:
"If the authorized representative designated by the administrator finds:
"(a) The individual has been discharged for misconduct connected with his work, or
"(c) The individual voluntarily left work without good cause, * * *
the individual shall be disqualified from the receipt of benefits * *
There are two issues raised. The first is whether claimant was discharged or whether he left work voluntarily. The board adopted the referee’s opinion finding…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arthur Winer, Inc. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
- Geraths v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Industrial Laundry v. Review Board, Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Boynton Cab Co. v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Parker v. St. Maries PlywoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Bunnell v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Giese v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- McDowell v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Steele v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.