Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 14, 1976No. CA 5604PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

Claimant appeals a denial of his claim for unemployment benefits made by the Employment Appeals Board, one member dissenting. ORS 657.176(2) provides:

"If the authorized representative designated by the administrator finds:
"(a) The individual has been discharged for misconduct connected with his work, or
"(c) The individual voluntarily left work without good cause, * * *

the individual shall be disqualified from the receipt of benefits * *

There are two issues raised. The first is whether claimant was discharged or whether he left work voluntarily. The board adopted the referee’s opinion finding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arthur Winer, Inc. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Geraths v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Industrial Laundry v. Review Board, Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Boynton Cab Co. v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Parker v. St. Maries PlywoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bunnell v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Giese v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. McDowell v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Steele v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API