Legal Opinion

Bunnell v. Employment Division

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1987No. EAB 86-AB-218; CA A39247; SC S33922PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Claimant petitioned this court to review a decision of the Court of Appeals, sitting in banc, which affirmed without opinion, by an equally divided court, an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) denying her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. The issue is whether the EAB correctly interpreted the language of an administrative rule.

The EAB adopted the factual findings and decision of the Employment Division hearings referee. The referee’s findings of fact are set forth below:

“(1) Claimant worked as a retail sales person in the employer’s department store from March 29, 1984…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Giese v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Geraths v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Babcock v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Romanosky v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Dietz v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Steele v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. City of Grants Pass v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Perez v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API