Legal Opinion
Newton v. Brodie
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1930No. Docket No. 255PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMES, J., pro tem.
Defendant City of Oceanside is a municipal corporation organized under the general Municipal Corporation Act of the state of California (Deering’s Gen. Laws 1923, Act 5233, sec. 850), as a city of the sixth class, while the other defendants, at the time of the institution of this action were members of and constituted its board of trustees. The plaintiffs are citizen residents and taxpayers of said city and brought this action for its benefit.
On the twenty-second day of September, 1926, one B. C. Beers presented to the board of trustees of said city his duly verified claim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Doland v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Stevens v. TrumanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wyckoff v. ForceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Martin v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- City of Glendale v. Crescenta Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Citizens' Committee for Old Age Pension v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Jarvis v. BloodgoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.