Stevens v. Truman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Carroll Cook, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Appeal from a judgment for a peremptory writ of mandate ordering appellant to pay to plaintiff one hundred and seventeen dollars for services as the regular phonographic reporter in Department 12 of the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco.
Plaintiff was duly appointed the phonographic reporter of the above-named court; he performed services as such, under order of the court, in certain felony cases and transcribed the testimony, the value of which services was found to be the above amount. Thereafter, to wit, on April 8, 1899, he served upon defendant an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Smith v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Barkly v. CopelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- McAllister v. HamlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Redding v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. White v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People Ex Rel. Board of Trustees v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Trower v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.