Legal Opinion
Jarvis v. Bloodgood
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 18, 1972No. Civ. 39038PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
In, a budget adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County (Board) for the fiscal year July 1, 1970' to June 30, 1971, Board, after public hearings (Gov. Code, §§ 29080-29082) on the budget, excluded an appropriation of $100,000 requested for the purpose of presenting opera for the fall of 1970 which had been recommended by the county’s music and performing arts commission and the county’s chief administrative officer. The appropriation and the recommendation had been protested by appellant Jarvis. The record does not establish that the protest was the reason for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Harris v. GibbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- County of Los Angeles v. NesvigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- City of Santa Monica v. GrubbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Orthodox Hebrew Board of Education v. Tax CommissionerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of King City v. Community Bank of CentralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. ParmarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Auerbach v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999