Ketch v. Cox
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
This appeal-is from n judgment foreclosing a subcontractor’s lien for lumber and rig material furnished and used in the construction of rigs on an oil and 'gas lease. The contention is that the petition does not allege, and the evidence does not show, ithat the rigs were constructed under a contract with the owners, or that the material was furnished under contract with the owners, or with Itheir agent.
This court has uniformly held that the •right to a materialman’s lien depends upon a contract with the owner.
“Under 'section 3862, Rev. Laws 1910, the right to a materialman’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis & YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lee v. TonsorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Gentry-Bowers Lumber Co. v. HamillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hoggson Bros. v. Dickason-Goodman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berry v. BarbourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Whitfield v. Frensley Bros. Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Rogers v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Birmingham v. Houston-Mccune Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Eason Oil Co. v. M. A. Swatek & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934