Gentry-Bowers Lumber Co. v. Hamill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. Clark, Judge. Action by the Gentry-Bowers Lumber Company against James H. Hamill and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, C. J.
Action by the Gentry-Bowers Lumber Company for a materialman’s lien against defendants in error. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
The lumber and material mentioned in this action was furnished by plaintiff to' Shirley, a contractor, and used in the erection of a building owned by Hamill. The lien is sought against the owner on -the theory that the contract to erect the building made tjie contractor his agent in purchasing the material. It is not sought to enforce a subcontractor’s lien.
Under sec. 3862, Rev. Laws 1910, any person furnishing material under a contract with the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stetson-Post Mill Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. SayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Darlington-Miller Lumber Co. v. LobsitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
3Cited by13 opinions
- Whitfield v. Frensley Bros. Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Rogers v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Aldridge v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Mobley v. Leeper Bros. Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Pirtle v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.