Legal Opinion

Berry v. Barbour

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1954No. 36047PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NEAL, Justice.

This is an action to recover a money judgment and the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiffs were engaged in the business of general contractors, and in April and August 1949, entered into agreements, as they allege, with defendant to repair a business building located in Norman, Oklahoma.

Plaintiffs plead that they performed the work and furnished the materials necessary to comply with the agreements. That there is due them the sum of $1,882.49 for which amount they pray…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Okmulgee v. MatlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Piggee v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Wm. Cameron & Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Beauchamp v. BeauchampSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Ketch v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Shebester v. Triple Crown InsurersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Welling v. American Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. T & S Investment Co. v. CourySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Frost v. Ponca CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Anderson v. CopelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API