Legal Opinion

Hoggson Bros. v. Dickason-Goodman Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 15, 1921No. 10046PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; N. E. McNeill, Judge. Action by Dickason-Goodman Lumber Company, a corporation, against H. P. Sinclair and others to enforce materialman’s lien. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants Hoggson Bros, and H. P. Sinclair bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This action was brought in the district court of Tulsa county by Dick-ason-Goodman Lumber Company, a corporation, as plaintiff, against H. P. Sinclair, Hoggson Bros., a corporation, O. L. Gent, and L. E. Kimberlin, as defendants, to recover the sum of $253.46, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from September 11, 1914, against the defendant O.' L. Gent, and seeking the foreclosure of a materialman’s lien upon certain real estate in the city of Tulsa, of which the defendant H. P. Sinclair was the owner. The defendant L. E. Kimber-lin, filed his sepárate answer and cross-petL.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Cydon Lodge No. 5Supreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  2. Clough v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Delahay v. GoldieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Davis v. BullardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. Main Street Hotel Co. v. Horton Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dolese Bros. Co. v. AndrecopulasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Newman v. KirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Antrim Lbr. Co. v. MendlikSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Hudson-Houston Lumber Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Sutherland Lumber Co. v. GaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API