Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Hughes
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1932No. Docket No. 8426PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
On February 27, 1930, judgment was entered in the above action in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant for $2,500 and costs. The action was one for personal injuries caused by the negligent operation of an automobile by the defendant. The latter was insured against loss or damage due to such .negligence by a policy of liability insurance issued by the Home Accident Insur anee Co. of Arkansas. 'Therein the insurer agreed “to defend in the name and on behalf of the assured any suit brought to enforce a claim for damages ...” and the policy also contained the following…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
- Forsythe v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Williams v. RiehlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Executors of White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1857
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Perry v. ErlingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Painter v. BerglundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Smith v. Fall River Joint Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- King v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.