Legal Opinion

Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Lyders

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1934No. Civ. No. 1140PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

This action was commenced by the respondent Hayward Lumber and Investment Company, as plaintiff, against appellant Eric Lyders, one IT. N. Stal-nalcer and others, as defendants. The complaint embraced two counts, one alleging a materialman’s lien for $1853.72 on a certain structure and the real property on which it was situate belonging to appellant Lyders in Imperial County, and the other seeking a recovery of the same amount on a quantum valebat for materials alleged to have been furnished to the said Stalnaker and said Lyders upon their orders. Lyders answered admitting…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hooper v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Insurance Co. v. StinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Delaware Ins. v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Mammoth Mining Co. v. Salt Lake Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. JR Simplot Company v. ChambersIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Eagle Star & British Dominions v. TadlockDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
  3. Delk v. Markel American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Pacific Insurance v. KentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
  5. Daniger v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API