Legal Opinion

Perry v. Erling

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1965No. 8161PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Judge.

In this case we have two separate appeals from a judgment entered in December, 1963, by the District Court of Burleigh County, quieting title to certain land in the plaintiff, Isabel M. Perry. A trial de novo is demanded.

The defendant Park District of the City of Bismarck, a public corporation, appeals, contending that the Perry action should have been dismissed for the reason that the contested land is owned by the United States Government. Defendants Erling et al. appeal, contending that title to the land should be quieted in the executors of the last will of Herman C.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States Ex Rel. Riverside Oil Co. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. United States Ex Rel. Ness v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Schwind v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Woodland v. WoodlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. AllesiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API