Legal Opinion

Williams v. Riehl

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1899No. Sac. No. 711PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Sacramento County denying a motion to satisfy a judgment of record, and to recall and quash a writ of execution for the sum of $1,875 and costs. Matt F. Johnson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

The defendant Riehl was the guardian of the estate of one Carver, a minor, and as such guardian executed a bond, as required by the order of the court in which the proceedings were pending, in the penal sum of $25,000, with the following named sureties for amounts named, respectively, to wit: F. S. Smith, for $25,000; George Peters, $5,000; William Johnston, $5,000; Stanton Myers, $5,000; Jacob Gehert, $5,000; D. T. Lufkin, $5,000, and Patrick Kelly, $5,000. Carver died, and plaintiff was appointed and qualified as administrator of his estate. The final account of defendant Riehl as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. FrankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Coffee v. TevisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Clark v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Davis v. HeimbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Johnson v. VaughnIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Phelps v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Lafleur v. M. A. Burns Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Winzler & Kelly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Tucker v. NicholsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Friedman v. MaltinskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API