Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1991No. S016134PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

—We granted review in this case to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeal as to when a cause of action against a title insurer alleging a failure to defend accrues under Code of Civil Procedure section 339, subdivision (hereafter section 339(1))—when the insurer refuses to defend, or when the underlying action is terminated by final judgment? 1 Section 339(1) provides for a two-year limitations period on an action founded on a policy of title insurance. Plaintiff Ward Lambert (Lambert) petitioned for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. J. Lamb, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API