Legal Opinion

Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. J. Lamb, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 2002No. B150674, B151708PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

The primary issue presented by these consolidated appeals 1 concerns the existence of coverage under a liability policy for a claim based upon disparaging statements allegedly made by the insured about a third party’s business and products.

The plaintiff and respondent, Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company (Atlantic Mutual), filed this action for declaratory relief seeking a determination that there was no coverage under its policy. The trial court agreed with Atlantic Mutual’s position and the defendants and appellants, J. Lamb, Inc. (Lamb), and Granite State Insurance Company…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  4. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Total Call International, Inc. v. Perless InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Emerald Bay Community Ass'n v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. New. Net, Inc. v. LavasoftDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
  5. Food Pro International, Inc. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API