Legal Opinion

Lantzy v. Centex Homes

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2003No. S098660PublishedCited by 199 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*366Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Depending on the theory of recovery, a lawsuit alleging a latent defect in the construction of an improvement to real property must be brought within three or four years after the plaintiff discovers the defect, or should have done so. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 337, subd. 1, 338, subds. (b), (c); Regents of University of California v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. (1978) 21 Cal.3d 624, 630 [147 Cal.Rptr. 486, 581 P.2d 197] (Regents).)1 However, a 1971 statute established a further general rule that no action for latent construction defects may be commenced more than 10 years…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. BeggerlySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by199 opinions

  1. Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Guerrero v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API