Lantzy v. Centex Homes
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*366Opinion
BAXTER, J.
Depending on the theory of recovery, a lawsuit alleging a latent defect in the construction of an improvement to real property must be brought within three or four years after the plaintiff discovers the defect, or should have done so. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 337, subd. 1, 338, subds. (b), (c); Regents of University of California v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. (1978) 21 Cal.3d 624, 630 [147 Cal.Rptr. 486, 581 P.2d 197] (Regents).)1 However, a 1971 statute established a further general rule that no action for latent construction defects may be commenced more than 10 years…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. BeggerlySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by199 opinions
- Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Guerrero v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.