Egan v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J,.
— Defendants appeal from a judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages for breach of an insurance contract. We conclude *815the judgment should be affirmed insofar as it awards compensatory damages against defendant Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company (Mutual) but reversed in all other respects.
In 1962, plaintiff purchased a health and disability insurance policy from defendant Mutual through its Los Angeles representative, the Hall-Worthing Agency (agency). The policy provided for lifetime benefits of $200 per month in event the insured became totally disabled as a result…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by515 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
510 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.