Legal Opinion

Egan v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1979No. L.A. 30747PublishedCited by 515 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J,.

— Defendants appeal from a judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages for breach of an insurance contract. We conclude *815the judgment should be affirmed insofar as it awards compensatory damages against defendant Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company (Mutual) but reversed in all other respects.

In 1962, plaintiff purchased a health and disability insurance policy from defendant Mutual through its Los Angeles representative, the Hall-Worthing Agency (agency). The policy provided for lifetime benefits of $200 per month in event the insured became totally disabled as a result…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by515 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986

510 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API