Legal Opinion

Laird v. Blacker

California Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1992No. S021074PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

We granted review to determine whether the one-year statute of limitations for attorney malpractice actions under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.6, subdivision (a) (all ftirther statutory references are to this code unless otherwise stated) is tolled during the time the client appeals from the underlying judgment on which the claim of malpractice is based.

*609Section 340.6 provides that the statute of limitations for legal malpractice commences when the client discovers, or should have discovered, the cause of action. The period is tolled during the times, inter alia, (i)…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Dunn v. RockwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API