Tchorbadjian v. Western Home Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
Introduction
Plaintiffs and appellants Ohannes Tchorbadjian and Magy Tchorbadjian (plaintiffs or the Tchorbadjians) appeal from the judgment entered following the grant of the motion for summary judgment of defendants and respondents Kane & Whelan and Allan Whelan (Whelan). Plaintiffs sued Whelan for legal malpractice. Whelan’s motion for summary judgment was granted on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.
The Tchorbadjians contend summary judgment was not proper because there exist triable issues concerning when the legal malpractice action…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Van Dyke v. Dunker & AcedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Casenas v. Fujisawa USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- S & R Auto Sales, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Millers Center, LLC, a Kentucky Limited Liability Company v. Morgan & Pottinger, P.S.C.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.