Legal Opinion

S & R Auto Sales, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 24, 2001No. MDL 1069PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOTZ, District Judge.

Ruth and Roger Miller, the principals of S & R Auto Sales, Inc., were members of the plaintiff class in these proceedings. The Millers received $6.82 million in the settlement of Borman I and are due to receive $700,000 more in the event that Borman II is affirmed on appeal. The present dispute involves the question of whether they are. entitled to recover an additional $7,475,000 for “blue sky” damages by enforcing an arbitration award they obtained on a claim for alleged professional malpractice against Lawrence Silver and his firm (“Silver”), their former…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. In Re American Honda Motor Co. Dealerships Litig.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  4. Sheperd v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1993
  5. Tchorbadjian v. Western Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  2. In re American Honda Lit v.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  3. Miller v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API