S & R Auto Sales, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTZ, District Judge.
Ruth and Roger Miller, the principals of S & R Auto Sales, Inc., were members of the plaintiff class in these proceedings. The Millers received $6.82 million in the settlement of Borman I and are due to receive $700,000 more in the event that Borman II is affirmed on appeal. The present dispute involves the question of whether they are. entitled to recover an additional $7,475,000 for “blue sky” damages by enforcing an arbitration award they obtained on a claim for alleged professional malpractice against Lawrence Silver and his firm (“Silver”), their former…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re American Honda Motor Co. Dealerships Litig.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Sheperd v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1993
- Tchorbadjian v. Western Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- In re American Honda Lit v.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Miller v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003