Legal Opinion

Van Dyke v. Dunker & Aced

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1996No. F023815PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

This professional malpractice action arises from erroneous income tax advice allegedly given by defendant accountants. Relying on the advice, the plaintiffs made a charitable contribution. When their income tax returns for the period were prepared and filed, they learned the advice was incorrect and they incurred taxes greater than expected. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants, concluding that the plaintiffs both discovered the negligence and suffered actual injury when they filed the tax return and paid their taxes. Because that occurred more than…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Khan v. Deutsche Bank AGIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Sahadi v. ScheafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API