Legal Opinion
Hill v. Tischer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 1, 1986No. C8-85-1965PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Respondent Kim Hill sued appellant Ronald E. Tischer, the owner of a, bar, for damages for personal injuries sustained while a patron of Tischer’s establishment. Tischer did not respond. Approximately six months after service of the complaint, Hill moved for a default judgment, which the trial court granted after an uncontested hearing.
Shortly after the default judgment was entered, Tischer moved to open the default judgment. The trial court denied his motion and Tischer appeals. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On January 18, 1985, Kim Hill was a patron in a bar owned by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Kosloski v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Guillaume & Associates, Inc. v. Don-John Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Vrooman Floor Covering Inc. v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Whipple v. MahlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Valley View, Inc. v. SchutteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Gelco Corp. v. Crystal Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Riemer v. ZahnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Wiethoff v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.