Legal Opinion

Wiethoff v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 6, 1987No. C3-87-1201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.

Keith Williams appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a default judgment. Default judgment was ordered when appellant failed to answer respondent’s complaint. Appellant claims that he is entitled to vacation of the judgment pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 60.02(1) (excusable neglect) or Rule 60.02(6) (any other reason justifying relief). The court found that appellant had no excuse for failing to answer and that there were no other factors justifying vacation of the default. We reverse.

FACTS

Appellant and respondent were involved in a car accident in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Kosloski v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Howard v. FrondellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Simons v. Schiek's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Guillaume & Associates, Inc. v. Don-John Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Katie Nesbit v. Antonio Arellano, Emilio Trevino.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API