Legal Opinion

Whipple v. Mahler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1943No. 33,381PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion to vacate and set aside a default judgment. It is also an appeal from the judgment.

There are two assignments of error with reference to the judgment, one by each defendant, identical in form, and stated in general terms, viz.: “The court erred in entering and docketing the judgment in favor of respondent and against appellant * *

No specific grounds of error are set out. Under these assignments defendants attempt to argue that the complaint did not state a cause of action against either and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farmers' Bank v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859
  2. Moot v. SearleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Charson v. Temple IsraelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Palmer A. Peterson v. Faye v. Peterson, Robert W. Dygert and James P. RorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Howard v. FrondellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Coller v. Guardian Angels Roman Catholic Church of ChaskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API