Legal Opinion

Vrooman Floor Covering Inc. v. Dorsey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1964No. 39,147PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion of defendant, James R. Dorsey, to vacate a default judgment.

Until April 1, 1962, defendant was an officer, employee, and stockholder of a company known as Better Floors, Inc. Thereafter he retained his position as secretary but was no longer actively employed by the company. Nevertheless, on April 17, 1962, he executed a written agreement guaranteeing up to $3,000 any credit extended by plaintiff to the corporation. According to defendant’s own affidavit, the purpose of the guaranty was “to obtain further credit from Vrooman…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. W. Davis & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Johnson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Unowsky v. ShowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Tiden v. ShursteadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sand v. School Service Employees Union, Local 284Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Hengel v. HyattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Hill v. TischerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Lund v. Pan American MacHines SalesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. TurpinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API