Legal Opinion
Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 9, 1990No. C6-89-1228PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellants Scandinavian U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc., an Ohio corporation (Scandinavian USSF), and U.S. Swim & Fitness Minnesota Inc., a Minnesota corporation (USSF Minnesota), appeal from an order denying their motions to vacate a default judgment and to dismiss USSF Minnesota from the judgment. The default judgment was initially entered against U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc., a name which Scandinavian USSF uses when transacting business.
Appellants claim they are entitled to vacation of the default judgment pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 60.02(a) (excusable neglect) or Rule 60.02(f)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Sommers v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Lange v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holman v. CPT CORP.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Peterson v. EishenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Marriage of Peterson v. EishenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Simington v. Minnesota Veterans HomeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Buck Blacktop, Inc. v. Gary Contracting and Trucking Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.