Legal Opinion

Blanc v. Connor

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1914No. S.F. No. 6425PublishedCited by 52 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for -a new trial.

The action was one in which a nephew sought to obtain specific performance of an alleged oral contract by which the aunt, according to his declaration, agreed to devise to him a certain parcel of land located in the city -and county of San Francisco. The court found that there was no such contract and the appeal is based largely upon the alleged errors in the making of findings to that effect.

Nearly all of the facts are undisputed. Indeed many of them are settled by stipulation. Alexander Blanc and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Baumann v. KusianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Russ v. MebiusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Werner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Estate of RollsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API