Legal Opinion

Milner v. Earl Fruit Co. of the Northwest

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1925PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Respondent in this action seeks to recover from appellant $7,766.04, an alleged balance due for his 1919 crop of apples which he alleges were delivered to the appellant at his special instance and request between September 22, 1919, and November 3, 1919. Appellant in his answer denies specifically the allegations of respondent’s complaint and affirmatively alleges that o> or about May 24, 1919, it en tered into a written consignment contract with respondent wherein it was mutually agreed that the entire apple crop of respondent for the year 1919, estimated at about 18,000 boxes, was to be…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Buhler v. LoftusMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Butterick Publishing Co. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Blanc v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Hurt v. Monumental Mercury Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Paurley v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Wormward v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Rollefson v. Lutheran BrotherhoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Valley Bank v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. West v. PraterIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API