Beeman v. Richardson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.
The plaintiff brought suit to recover from the defendants the sum of five thousand five hundred dollars, which he had paid a corporation known as the Richardson, Holmes & Lamb Company for fifty shares of its capital stock. The cause of action as set out in the complaint was that the defendants were the stockholders and officers of the corporation; that the plaintiff had been induced to purchase the stock by their fraudulent representations made to him, pursuant to a conspiracy between them to defraud him, and that the stock had proven worthless. After trial the lower court made findings in…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
- Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- State of California v. DayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Campbell v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dandini v. DandiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.