Legal Opinion

Carson v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1925No. 24,521PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action upon a benefit insurance policy, trial to the court, and findings for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the order denying the motion to amend the findings so as to grant it judgment, or a new trial.

Plaintiff was working near the top of an 18-foot telephone pole, when it broke and fell to the ground. He received a severe jolt, but could drive home in his car. After staying in bed a few days, he was able to go back to work. Within a day or two thereafter he had another mishap in that the eye of one of the climbers broke as he was high up on a pole at work, but the safety belt around his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Young v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  3. Hurley v. Bankers Life Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Johnson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Monahan v. Supreme Lodge of the Order of Columbian KnightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. Bulluck v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API