Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of Chatfield
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Fillmore county, Whytock, J., denying its motion for a new trial after a verdict for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The defendant, an accident insurance company, issued its policy to plaintiff, whereby it insured him as a merchant by occupation, under classification preferred,
“in the sum of $25 per week, against loss of time not to exceed twenty-six consecutive weeks, resulting from bodily injuries effected through means aforesaid (of which there shall be external and visible signs), wholly and continuously disabling said member from irons- • acting any and every Jcind of business pertaining to the occupation above stated.”
Plaintiff alleged that on May 21, 1895, and during the life of the policy, he was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Lyon v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Young v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- Wolcott v. United Life & Accident InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Saveland v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by68 opinions
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Winters Mut. Aid Ass'n Circle No. 2 v. ReddinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.