Legal Opinion
Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 3, 1933No. 29,117PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial after a verdict had been directed for defendant.
The action is to recover 23 disability instalment payments under a life insurance policy issued to plaintiff by defendant with a disability rider attached. The contents of this rider is the sole subject of our present consideration. The annual premium on the life policy Avas $133.90, and the annual premium on the disability rider was $21.80. The policy was issued September 21, 1928.
Through the rider defendant agreed, upon due proof being furnished, that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ginell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.