Bulluck v. Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeoodeN, J.
Five recent decisions of this Court discuss the liability of insurance companies to the assured resulting from permanent disability to engage in a “gainful occupation,” to wit: Buckner v. Ins. Co., 172 N. C., 762; Lee v. Ins. Co., 188 N. C., 538; Fields v. Assurance Co., 195 N. C., 262; Brinson v. Ins. Co., 195 N. C., 332; Metts v. Ins. Co., 198 N. C., 197. The Buckner case, supra, declared: “The authorities are practically unanimous that under the terms of this policy plaintiff cannot recover without showing a bodily injury that will incapacitate him not only from following his usual…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- McCutchen v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Buckner v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Carson v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Fagerlie v. New York Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Thigpen v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Misskelley v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Gregory v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Leonard v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Mitchell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.