Legal Opinion

Rogler v. Bocook

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1938No. 34,034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action in which the plaintiffs sought, under their first cause of action, to obtain a decree of title to land on the theory a constructive trust had been created in their favor by virtue of an oral contract, and wherein they also sought, under the second cause of action, to obtain damages on the ground defendant had slandered their title. The specifications of error are:

"1. The trial court erred in refusing appellants’ request for a jury trial.
“2. In holding that the case only involved an equitable issue, and was not a jury case.
“…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Hargis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Rogler v. BocookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bynum v. BynumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Langhoff v. MarrCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Runyan v. BangsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Bocook v. RoglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Bynum v. BynumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API