Legal Opinion

Bynum v. Bynum

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1975No. 1395Published

1Opinion of the Court

531 P.2d 618 (1975)

87 N.M. 195

Harold D. BYNUM and Jane M. Bynum, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees,

v.

Sue M. Bynum, Oliver Burton Cohen and Elizabeth J. Cohen, his wife, Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

No. 1395.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

January 8, 1975.

Certiorari Denied January 30, 1975.

Charles G. Berry, Mary C. Walters, Marchiondo & Berry, P.A., Albuquerque, for plaintiffs-appellants and cross-appellees.

Perry S. Key, Oliver Burton Cohen, Albuquerque, for defendants-appellees and cross-appellants, Cohen.

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

This appeal is concerned with the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wolf v. PerryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Van Orman v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Williams v. AshcraftNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API