Bynum v. Bynum
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
This appeal is concerned with the tort of wrongfully interfering with a contract, proof of part performance in a claim for breach of an oral contract to sell real estate and a counterclaim for slander of title.
Harold and Jane Bynum brought suit against Sue, the former wife of Harold, Oliver Cohen an attorney and Elizabeth the wife of Cohen. The case went to trial on an amended complaint which sought specific performance of an oral contract between Sue and Harold to convey Sue’s dwelling, sought damages for breach of the oral contract and sought damages for inducing a…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Wolf v. PerryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Williams v. AshcraftNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- M & M Rental Tools, Inc. v. Milchem, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sanchez v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Acme Cigarette Services, Inc. v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Deaton v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.