Legal Opinion

Bocook v. Rogler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 27, 1940No. 34,562; No. 34,563Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

In previous litigation between the parties Bocook had recovered judgment against the Roglers in the district court. They appealed, and in each of two cases gave a supersedeas bond. The judgments of the trial court were affirmed. (Rogler v. Bocook, 146 Kan. 933, 73 P. 2d 1100, and Rogler v. Bocook, 148 Kan. 858, 84 P. 2d 893.) This litigation involved a certain residence property in Cottonwood Falls, and one of them was an action for forcible detention originally brought before a justice of the peace. On January 8,1939, after this court's…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ray v. BrennerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Hier v. HarpsterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Rogler v. BocookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Rogler v. BocookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Tackett v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API