Legal Opinion

Langhoff v. Marr

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 31, 1990No. 113, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, Judge.

In this case we will decide whether a professional association of lawyers, at the time of termination, should be treated as a corporation or as a partnership. It will be upon our disposition of this issue that the distribution of the assets of the professional association will depend.

Stephen D. Langhoff (Langhoff), appellant, terminated a successful law partnership, Smith and Langhoff (S. & L.) with Parker Smith, and entered what was to be a short-lived, unsuccessful relationship with Michael E. Marr, P.C. (Marr), appellee, and Richard Bennett (Bennett) in a professional service…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Maryland Metals, Inc. v. MetznerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Jewel v. BoxerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Becker v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. C-E-I-R, Inc. v. Computer Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Vogelhut v. KandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Michael E. Marr, P.C. v. LanghoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. First Union National Bank v. Meyer, Faller, Weisman & Rosenberg, P.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Sufrin v. HosierDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. First American Bank v. ShiversCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Hansen v. LarsenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API