Marsico v. Marsico
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
This appeal requires us to determine the meaning of a provision of a settlement agreement incorporated into the judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties. Because we agree with the interpretation adopted by the trial court, we find no error.
On December 2, 1981, the plaintiff wife obtained a dissolution of her marriage to the defendant husband. The judgment “incorporated by reference” the property settlement agreement signed by the parties. See *492General Statutes § 46b-66. The eighth paragraph of the settlement agreement recites that the parties recognize that the defendant husband’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sturtevant v. SturtevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Marcus v. MarcusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- New Haven Sand Blast Co. v. DreisbachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Bronson v. BronsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- McDonnell v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Guille v. GuilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Baldwin v. BaldwinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Kaplan v. KaplanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Coscina v. CoscinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- City of Waterbury v. Town of Wash., No. X01-Uwy-Cv97-140886 (Feb. 16, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000