Legal Opinion
Sturtevant v. Sturtevant
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 28, 1959PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kiítg, J.
On July 16, 1934, the plaintiff and the defendant were divorced in Eeno, Nevada. The defendant then was, and still is, a practicing physician. A separation agreement, hereinafter referred to as the agreement, had been executed on July 9, and at the parties’ request it was approved by the court and incorporated in the divorce decree. By the terms of the agreement, jurisdiction was expressly retained by the court to modify, “as circumstances in the future may then warrant,” the provisions with regard to alimony for the plaintiff, support for the three minor children, their custody, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Douglas v. WillcutsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- German v. GermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Ives v. City of WillimanticSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Osborne v. Locke Steel Chain Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Hess v. Dumouchel Paper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Stocker v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- City of Hartford v. Hartford Municipal Employees Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.