Legal Opinion

Guille v. Guille

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 14, 1985No. 12156PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether a court may properly delete from a judgment of marital dissolution a provision that would preclude any future judicial modification of the terms governing child support contained in the original divorce *261decree. Six years after the marriage of the parties was dissolved, the trial court that had entered the judgment of dissolution granted a motion, brought on behalf of the parties’ minor children, to open the judgment and delete therefrom a provision precluding modification of custody and child support. The defendant father appeals from the trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Sillman v. SillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Broaca v. BroacaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Bryan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. Scoville v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. In re Bruce R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Favrow v. VargasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Masters v. MastersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API