Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. Kaplan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 8, 1986No. 4220PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify a judgment of dissolution of marriage rendered in 1975. The sole issue *115involves the circumstances under which a court may modify a judgment, which is silent on the issue of child support, in order to award support in favor of the custodial parent, in the absence of a showing of a substantial and unforeseen change in circumstances. The court denied the motion because the defendant failed to establish such a change of circumstances. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, we find error.
The facts are undisputed.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Guille v. GuilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Kelepecz v. KelepeczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Marsico v. MarsicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Rempt v. RemptConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cattaneo v. CattaneoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Seaver v. SeaverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Coscina v. CoscinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Mehrmanesh v. Mehrmanesh, No. No Fa 92-0516832 (Feb. 11, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Steve v. Warden, State Prison, No. Cv 92 1512 S (Jun. 15, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994