New Haven Sand Blast Co. v. Dreisbach
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
The defendant’s first and fourth contentions are that Exhibit A is null and void because the original contract, Exhibit A, does not conform to the antecedent negotiations for the sale of the Dreisbach patent to the plaintiff as evidenced by the records of the corporation, in that there is no mention in those records of a covenant for future conveyances; and, further, because it is claimed that Exhibit A was restated and superseded by the subsequent execution of Exhibit R, which is a second written assignment of the patent to the plaintiff, not containing the covenant for future conveyances.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Birkery Manufacturing Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Chamberlain v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. GogginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Marcus v. MarcusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- New Haven Sand Blast Co. v. DreisbachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Swayze v. SwayzeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.