Legal Opinion
State v. Korhn
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 25, 1996No. 14345PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The defendant, Robert Korhn, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influ*875ence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a) (2).1 The defendant claims that General Statutes § 14-227a (c) (6),2 as amended by No. 93-371, § 2, of the 1993 Public Acts,3 is unconstitutional as written or applied in this case and that the court’s charge to the jury, which outlined and applied the presumption set forth in said section as to the defendant’s blood alcohol content (BAC) at the time of the alleged…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. BarberConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Dumont v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. PilottiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- In re Steven M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.