Legal Opinion
In re Steven M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 26, 2002No. AC 20866PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The respondent appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion filed by the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner), to transfer him from Long Lane School to the John R. Manson Youth Institution pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-12 (a).1 The respondent first claims that § 17a-12 (a) is unconstitutional on its face. We need not reach that claim. In the alternative, he argues that the application of the statute is unconstitutional because he was denied due process of law. The trial *429court rejected his claims. We disagree and vacate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Stevem M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- In re Steven M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- In Re Earl B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- In Re Earl B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010