Legal Opinion
State v. Pilotti
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 13, 2007No. AC 26220PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, J.
The defendant, Charles Pilotti, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while having an elevated blood alcohol content in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the breath test results from the Intoxilyzer 5000 EN (Intoxilyzer) were inadmissible because they failed to comply with regulations and statutes in that the results were volume based, not weight based, and (2) the court improperly denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal because the evidence adduced at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McClean v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. HoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Stash v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. TietjenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Stash v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Superior Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.